Using Unnumbered Point-to-Point Interface in RSVP

This feature introduces the use of unnumbered IP interface as a Traffic Engineering (TE) link for the signaling of RSVP P2P LSP and P2MP LSP.

An unnumbered IP interface is identified uniquely on a router in the network by the tuple {router-id, ifIndex}. Each side of the link assigns a system-wide unique interface index to the unnumbered interface. ISIS, OSPF, RSVP, and OAM modules use this tuple to advertise the link information, signal LSP paths over this unnumbered interface, or send and respond to an MPLS echo request message over an unnumbered interface.

The interface borrowed IP address is used exclusively as the source address for IP packets that are originated from the interface and needs to be configured to an address different from system interface for the FRR bypass LSP to come up at the ingress LER.

The borrowed IP address for an unnumbered interface is configured using the following CLI command with a default value set to the system interface address:

config>router>if>unnumbered [ip-int-name | ip-address]

The support of unnumbered TE link in IS-IS consists of adding a new sub-TLV of the extended IS reachability TLV, which encodes the Link Local and Link Remote Identifiers as defined in RFC 5307.

The support of unnumbered TE link in OSPF consists of adding a new sub-TLV, which encodes the same Link Local and Link Remote Identifiers in the Link TLV of the TE area opaque LSA and sends the local Identifier in the Link Local Identifier TLV in the TE link local opaque LSA as per RFC 4203.

The support of unnumbered TE link in RSVP implements the signaling of unnumbered interfaces in ERO/RRO as per RFC 3477 and the support of IF_ID RSVP_HOP object with a new Ctype as per Section 8.1.1 of RFC 3473. The IPv4 Next/Previous Hop Address field is set to the borrowed IP interface address.

The unnumbered IP is advertised by IS-IS TE and OSPF TE, and CSPF can include them in the computation of a path for a P2P LSP or for the S2L of a P2MP LSP. This feature does not, however, support defining an unnumbered interface a hop in the path definition of an LSP.

A router creates an RSVP neighbor over an unnumbered interface using the tuple {router-id, ifIndex}. The router-id of the router that advertised a specific unnumbered interface index is obtained from the TE database. As a result, if TE is disabled in IS-IS or OSPF, a non-CSPF LSP with the next-hop for its path is over an unnumbered interface does not come up at the ingress LER because the router-id of the neighbor that has the next-hop of the path message cannot be looked up. In this case, the LSP path remains in the operationally down state with a reason noRouteToDestination. If a PATH message was received at the LSR in which TE was disabled and the next-hop for the LSP path is over an unnumbered interface, a PathErr message is sent back to the ingress LER with the "Routing Problem" error code of 24 and an error value of 5 ‟No route available toward destination”.

All MPLS features available for numbered IP interfaces are supported, with the exception of the following:

This feature also extends the support of lsp-ping, p2mp-lsp-ping, lsp-trace, and p2mp-lsptrace to P2P and P2MP LSPs that have unnumbered TE links in their path.