Solution Description for PBB Epipe over G.8031 Ethernet Tunnels

This section discusses the Access multi-homing solution for PBB E-Line over an infrastructure of G.8031 Ethernet tunnels. Although a specific use case is used, the solution works the same for any other PBB infrastructure: for example, native PBB, pseudowire/MPLS, or a combination.

The PBB E-Line service and the related BVPLS infrastructure are depicted in Figure 1.

Figure 1. Access Multi-Homing Solution for PBB Epipe

The E-Line instances are connected through the B-VPLS infrastructure. Each B-VPLS is interconnected to the BEBs in the remote pair using the G.8031, Ethernet Protection Switched (EPS) tunnels. Only the active Ethernet paths are shown in the network diagram to simplify the explanation. Split Horizon Groups may be used on EPS tunnels to avoid running MSTP/RSTP in the PBB core.

The same B-MAC addressing scheme is used as in the E-LAN case: a B-MAC per B-VPLS and additional B-MACs associated with each MC-LAG connected to an Epipe SAP. The B-MACs associated with the active MC-LAG are actively used for forwarding into B-VPLS the traffic ingressing related Epipe SAPs.

MC-LAG protocol keeps track of which side is active and which is standby for a specified MC-LAG grouping and activates the standby link in a failure scenario. The source B-MACs C1 and A1 are used for PBB encapsulation as traffic arrives at the Epipe SAPs on P11 and P9, respectively. MAC learning in the B-VPLS instances installs MAC FDB entries in BEB C and BEB A as depicted in Figure 1. The highlighted Ethernet tunnel (EPS) is used to forward the traffic between BEB A and BEB C.

Active link (P11) or access node (BEB C) failures are activating through MC-LAG protocol, the standby link (P12) participating in the MC-LAG on the pair MC-LAG device (BEB D). The failure of BEB C is depicted in Figure 2. The same procedure applies for the link failure case.

Figure 2. Access Dual-Homing for PBB E-Line - BEB Failure

The following process steps apply:

The same process is executed for all the MC-LAGs affected by BEB C failure so BEB failure can be the worst case scenario.